DIY-DM Kits

Before

After

Project Objective

The objective of this project was to create a diabetes management kit that aids patients recently diagnosed with diabetes with managing their diagnosis.

Project Details

The DIY-DM kits are part of an NIH-sponsored project with collaborators from Northwestern’s Feinberg School of Medicine and the Segal Design Institute. My main role in this project was to design and develop design solutions to improve the user experience of the DIY-DM kits based on different user group feedback over the summer. Once the major design problems were solved, my role transitioned from designing to overseeing and documenting the manufacturing process of 120 of these DIY diabetic management (DM) kits for NIH-sponsored clinical trials set to begin in the fall.

Project Summary

Type: Human-Centered Design, Manufacturing, Product Design
Client: Feinberg School of Medicine
Duration: June 2021 - June 2022
Role: Engineering Design Intern
Deliverables: Documentation, Physical Prototype

3D Printing: Monoprice V2
3D Printing: Ultimaker 2+
Collaboration
Computer-Aided Design (CAD): Solidworks
Laser Cutting
Rapid Prototyping
Vacuum Forming
UX Design

Motivation for the DIY-DM Kits

The DIY-DM kits were created to help people recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes manage their condition and learn to take care of themselves, as this diagnosis brings on a series of lifestyle changes for the user, which include things such as learning to take their own glucose levels or injecting themselves with insulin when needed.

To help these patients quickly grasp the necessary treatment steps they need to integrate into their lifestyle once they leave the hospital, the DIY-DM kits provide patients with the basic tools they will need to use to conduct their treatments in a simple and accessible format, accompanied with both physical and digital copies of their treatment plan to walk them through the process.

Complete DIY-DM Kit

Designing a numerical labeling system

One of the major pain points identified through user testing was that older patients had difficulty identifying how components of the kit fit into the plastic inserts within each box.

To solve that issue, I suggested creating a numerical labeling system that mapped each section of the plastic inserts to the stickers found on the inner side of the lids.

The process of creating the numerical labeling system for the vacuum-formed inserts were as follows:

  • Determining the best type of labeling system (text, numerical, etc.)
  • Determining the best method of creating the labels (embossing, debossing, silk screening, etc.)
  • Creating a proof of concept by 3D printing the molds and testing them out on the vacuum forming machine
  • Creating new vacuum forming molds for each type of insert
  • Troubleshooting the vacuum forming process to create bubble-free inserts
  • Mass-producing the vacuum-formed inserts
Modified CAD model for the molds
Creating the new vacuum forming molds
Failed test during vacuum forming

Once I had determined that embossing the numerical labeling system worked best from both a user and manufacturing perspective, the other interns implemented these changes into all future inserts created for the clinical trials and the impact these changes had to the DIY-DM kits can be summarized as follows:

  • Improved packing time and increased object recognition during subsequent user tests
  • Decreased confusion amongst older patients in their interactions with the kits
  • Little to no mention of aforementioned pain points in future observations
New vacuum formed insert

Creating a skin mold testing protocol

Another important component of the DIY-DM kits was the skin molds, which were included in the kit to provide users with a fake skin sample on which to practice injecting insulin. There were a number of questions associated to the design of these molds, as listed below:

  • Which solvent ratios would replicate the consistency of human skin the best?
  • Which ratios would accommodate the most amount of saline solution to be injected into the mold?
  • How do we accommodate for representation in the skin molds that were included in the DIY-DM kits?
Testing different dyes to create a range of skin molds

To solve the questions above, I generated a testing protocol to answer each one of the questions listed out in the following way:

  • Designing a system to generate different solvent ratios by keeping two solvents constant and varying the third in whole increments from 1 to 4
  • Creating tests to determine the maximum amount of saline each skin mold consistency could contain by starting with 10cc injections of saline and increasing the volume injected by 10cc until the skin molds failed
  • Experimenting with pre-made dyes and dyes mixed ourselves to determine the range of skin colors that could be represented within the skin molds
  • Testing various methods to create repeatable skin mold colors, including using a scale and dropper to keep dye ratios consistent
Final skin mold spectrum consisted of clear, light, medium, and dark skin molds

Fine-tuning the manufacturing process for clinical trials

As we began mass production in preparation for the fall clinical trials, some of the bottlenecks that I was tasked with resolving included the following:

  • Working around material shortages and delays in shipping from our material suppliers
  • Troubleshooting the vacuum forming and instruction laminating processes to ensure that the products we were producing were of top quality
  • Creating efficient mass production methods to speed up production and meet our clinical trial deadline
Chipboard boxes acting as the base of the kits
Stack of modified vacuum formed inserts
Stacks of completed DIY-DM kits